In my dreams, my offbeat political opinions have relevance.
I like to imagine running for office on a platform of balanced migration.
It's called One In, One Out. And they have to be equivalent migrants in every way.
A self-correcting mechanism, it seems like the perfect solution.
Surely anyone who believes the number of immigrants should equal the number of emigrants can't be a racist? They must be just the opposite.
Balanced migration is a political tool.
Anyone can use it to oppose the tsunami of Third World immigration and partial population replacement in the West.
Right wing demagogues could avoid arrest and imprisonment. They could even claim to be pro-migration.
However, if carried out, such a proposal would lead to race mixing.
It would start to squeeze the Bell Curve, and shrink humanity's top IQ distribution.
That's assuming we're talking about balanced race mixing, not white nerds impregnating tribal mamas, like that could happen.
Eventually there would be fewer extraordinary geniuses born, but the population exchange would also raise the worst countries IQ rates.
I believe only a few great geniuses could save mankind. They are rarer than we think, even with a population of billions.
If race mixing led to higher IQs all round, I would be its biggest proponent.
How nice that would be, like a Hollywood movie. Reality is not nice at all.
What matters about my proposal is that it's self limiting. It's fail safe.
After all, it would have to be voluntary balanced migration.
No one would want to move to the worst countries until the worst countries got their shit together.
Until then, these lands could not export their brightest and most ambitious people to the West. Or their most desperate ones.